How SBO3L compares

Agent-policy is a crowded space. Most projects answer "can the agent do this?". SBO3L also answers "can anyone offline prove what the agent did?" — that's the cryptographic trust layer. Below: features hand-checked against each project's docs as of 2026-04.

means the project could ship the feature with effort but doesn't today.

Feature SBO3L OPA Casbin Guardrails AI LangChain callbacks
Local policy engine (no remote daemon required)
Cryptographically signed decision receipts
Hash-chained audit log (tamper-evident)
Offline capsule verification (no network)
On-chain anchor (Ethereum L2)
ENS-based agent identity
Threshold signing (FROST 2-of-3)
Multi-tenant isolation w/ RLS
Built-in budget tracking + USD-string parser
WASM-deployable verifier (browser, mobile)
Framework adapters (>=10 frameworks)
Bench: P50 decision latency < 200µs

Where each tool wins

Where SBO3L wins

The cryptographic-receipt + audit-chain + on-chain-anchor stack is uniquely SBO3L. If a regulator, auditor, or sponsor asks "prove this agent acted within policy on 2026-03-15 at 14:22:01 UTC", SBO3L answers with a self-contained capsule any third party can verify offline against the agent's public Ed25519 key. No other project in this matrix produces an artifact with that property.

Try the WASM playground → 5-minute quickstart →