How SBO3L compares

Agent-policy is a crowded space. Most projects answer "can the agent do this?". SBO3L also answers "can anyone offline prove what the agent did?" — that's the cryptographic trust layer. Below: features hand-checked against each project's docs as of 2026-04.

— means the project could ship the feature with effort but doesn't today.

Feature SBO3L OPA Casbin Guardrails AI LangChain callbacks
Local policy engine (no remote daemon required) ✓✓✓✗—
Cryptographically signed decision receipts ✓✗✗✗✗
Hash-chained audit log (tamper-evident) ✓✗✗✗✗
Offline capsule verification (no network) ✓——✗✗
On-chain anchor (Ethereum L2) ✓✗✗✗✗
ENS-based agent identity ✓✗✗✗✗
Threshold signing (FROST 2-of-3) ✓✗✗✗✗
Multi-tenant isolation w/ RLS ✓——✗✗
Built-in budget tracking + USD-string parser ✓✗✗✗✗
WASM-deployable verifier (browser, mobile) ✓✓✓✗✗
Framework adapters (>=10 frameworks) ✓——✓✓
Bench: P50 decision latency < 200µs ✓✓✓——

Where each tool wins

Where SBO3L wins

The cryptographic-receipt + audit-chain + on-chain-anchor stack is uniquely SBO3L. If a regulator, auditor, or sponsor asks "prove this agent acted within policy on 2026-03-15 at 14:22:01 UTC", SBO3L answers with a self-contained capsule any third party can verify offline against the agent's public Ed25519 key. No other project in this matrix produces an artifact with that property.

Try the WASM playground → 5-minute quickstart →